Creator Economy

15-25% of brand budgets shift to creator economy: IIGC

15-25% of brand marketing budgets moving towards creator economy: IIGC - Storyboard18
15-25% of brand marketing budgets moving towards creator economy: IIGC - Storyboard18stevepb / pixabay

The IIGC says 15-25% of brand marketing budgets are moving toward creators, but the body released no methodology, sample size, or time window. Marketers planning 2026 need more than a range.

By Grace Kim

2 min read

At a glance

  • The IIGC said 15-25% of brand marketing budgets are shifting to the creator economy, reported by Storyboard18.
  • The IIGC framed the move as a 'movement' or migration of spend, not a reallocation of surplus.
  • No methodology, sample size, or time window was disclosed alongside the 10-percentage-point range.
  • The figure puts creator spend on par with paid search or out-of-home in some planning decks.
  • IIGC did not specify whether 'brand marketing budget' covers media spend only or also production, agency fees, and in-house creator teams.

Roughly 15-25% of brand marketing budgets are shifting toward the creator economy, the India Influencer Grid Council (IIGC) told Storyboard18. The IIGC framed the figure as a "movement" of money rather than a reallocation of surplus.

The range is one of the first quantified signals from an India-based industry body on the size of the migration. It puts creator spend on par with paid search or out-of-home in some planning decks.

What the IIGC is actually claiming

The IIGC's headline number — that one to four marketing dollars out of every twenty now flow to creators and influencer-driven programs — places the creator economy alongside established line items. The council presented the shift as structural, not experimental.

That framing matters. A migration implies the money is leaving somewhere else, presumably traditional digital, broadcast, or above-the-line media. It also means the IIGC sees this as a multi-year trend, not a single-quarter spike.

What the IIGC isn't saying

Here's where the skeptical read kicks in. The council did not publish a methodology, sample size, or time window alongside the 15-25% range.

We don't know if the figure covers a single quarter, a forward forecast, or a blended multi-year average. We don't know how many CMOs, agencies, or brand marketers fed numbers into the estimate. We don't know what "brand marketing budget" actually includes — media spend only, or also production, agency fees, and in-house creator teams.

A range that wide — ten percentage points — also hints at survey noise rather than a precise read. The IIGC owes its readers tighter numbers, and a footnote.

What does this change for marketers?

If the lower end holds, creator line items deserve a permanent column in next year's planning decks, not a campaign add-on. If the upper end holds, you're watching a structural re-prioritization away from traditional digital and TV.

Either way, agency briefs need a higher bar on creator selection, measurement, and disclosure compliance. For smaller brands, the practical read is tighter: demand at this scale won't lower average cost-per-engagement for mid-tier creators — it raises it. Plan for that.

What would make this report useful

Three things would turn the IIGC's number into a benchmark. A defined spend scope. A participant count. A year-over-year comparison. Without those, marketers swapping notes at a conference will share vibes, not data.

The IIGC's range is a useful flag, not a benchmark. Treat it as a directional signal that India's creator economy has crossed from experimental to structural, and pressure any vendor or report you read next for the methodology behind its own numbers.

We'll be watching for the IIGC's full report — and the footnotes that probably weren't in the headline.

Source: Google News: Creator economy

Grace Kim

Show full bio

Senior reporter covering companies, deals and strategy in Social platform news and policy at Reach Brief.

More from Grace Kim →

Related articles

« Previous articleNext article »