Audience Trust Is Creator Marketing's Real Currency, Says Pranjali Papnai

Pranjali Papnai argues audience trust, not follower counts, is creator marketing's real currency — shifting how brands should pick and pay creators.
By Marcus Bennett
2 min readAt a glance
- Pranjali Papnai says audience trust is the real currency of creator marketing
- The argument positions trust above follower counts as the key creator-selection metric
- Views were shared in an interview published by Social Samosa
- No platform policy change or benchmark data is attached to the claim — it is a practitioner's position
Audience trust — not follower counts — is the real currency of creator marketing, according to Pranjali Papnai, whose views on the creator economy appear in a new Social Samosa interview.
That framing lands at a moment when brands are rethinking how they measure creator partnerships. Papnai's argument, as presented in the interview, centers on a simple proposition: a creator's value to advertisers comes from the credibility they've built with their audience, not from raw distribution metrics.
What does this change for practitioners?
If trust is the operative asset, then campaign planning shifts. Instead of prioritizing reach and impressions when selecting creators, marketers would weight engagement quality, audience relationship, and content authenticity — signals that are harder to fake and slower to build.
For creators themselves, the implication cuts both ways. Trust compounds slowly but erodes fast, which puts a premium on editorial consistency and on being selective about brand partnerships. One misaligned sponsored post can undercut the credibility that a creator has spent years establishing.
The argument also reframes how sponsors should read performance. A trusted creator's endorsement can convert at rates that outperform equivalent paid impressions — the logic behind why brands keep returning to long-term creator relationships rather than one-off placements.
Official position vs. interpretation
Papnai's position is an individual practitioner's view, not a platform policy or industry benchmark. There's no hard rollout date, algorithm change, or cost figure attached to it. Treat it as directional guidance for partnership strategy, not as measured data on campaign outcomes.
Still, the thesis aligns with broader industry movement. Brands have been shifting budgets toward micro- and mid-tier creators, where audience relationships tend to be tighter, even as macro-influencer rates stay elevated.
For anyone planning creator campaigns this quarter, the practical takeaway from Papnai's argument is straightforward: audit your creator selection criteria for trust signals — comment quality, repeat engagement, content consistency — before defaulting to follower counts. Expect that lens to matter more as the creator economy matures.
Source: Google News: Creator economy
Marcus Bennett
Show full bio
Market editor covering money, funding and market shifts around Social platform news and policy at Reach Brief.
Related articles
Gregory Curtis Jr.: Brands Should Run Creator Marketing Like Media Buys
Jhanvi Bhatia argues declining brand deals builds creator credibility
30 Creator Economy Execs Name the Industry's Biggest Unsolved Problem
Programmatic-ification of creators: an unresolved industry debate
Nearly Half of Brands Report 3x Return on Creator Marketing